Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

California Additional Auditing and Oversight for "Over-Policed Jurisdictions" Initiative (2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California "Over-Policed Rights Act" Initiative
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 8, 2016
Topic
Law enforcement
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
State statute
Origin
Citizens


Voting on
Law Enforcement
Law enforcement.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Local Measures

The California Additional Auditing and Oversight for "Over-Policed Jurisdictions" Initiative (#15-0124) was a proposed initiative and was not put on the November 8, 2016, ballot in California as an initiated state statute.

This initiative was called the "Over-Policed Rights Act" by petitioners.[1]

This initiative was designed to establish a process for the courts to designate certain law enforcement jurisdictions as "over-policed" if patterns of excessive force or discrimination are observed. Under the initiative, such jurisdictions would be subject to additional oversight and auditing, with court-mandated measures to reduce excessive force and discrimination.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was:[2]

Law Enforcement. Use of Excessive Force. Discrimination. Initiative Statute.[3]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was:[2]

Establishes court process for designating a state or local law enforcement agency as an “over-policed jurisdiction” when the agency has shown a pattern of using excessive force or discrimination for at least twelve months. Subjects such agency to increased auditing, reporting, and drug testing requirements, monitoring by volunteer observers, loss of equipment, potential loss of State funding, mandatory use of body cameras, and other remedies ordered by court. Permits agency to petition court to remove designation after compliance with court order for at least one year.[3]

Full text

The full text of the measure could be found here.

Fiscal impact

Note: The fiscal impact statement for a California ballot initiative authorized for circulation is jointly prepared by the state's legislative analyst and its director of finance. The statement for this initiative:[2]

Potential state court costs that could range in the millions of dollars annually related to hearing and processing cases filed under the measure and oversight of law enforcement agencies found to be over-policing. Potential state and local law enforcement costs that could be in the tens of millions of dollars annually primarily related to compliance with requirements placed on agencies found to be over-policing.[3]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in California and California signature requirements


State profile

Demographic data for California
 CaliforniaU.S.
Total population:38,993,940316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):155,7793,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:61.8%73.6%
Black/African American:5.9%12.6%
Asian:13.7%5.1%
Native American:0.7%0.8%
Pacific Islander:0.4%0.2%
Two or more:4.5%3%
Hispanic/Latino:38.4%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:81.8%86.7%
College graduation rate:31.4%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$61,818$53,889
Persons below poverty level:18.2%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in California.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

Presidential voting pattern

See also: Presidential voting trends in California

California voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.


More California coverage on Ballotpedia

See also

Footnotes